What's the best way to do FA or PCA in the Tidyverse? Right now, I switch to base R using princomp() or the pysch package for my series reduction work.

Are there any solutions that fit into the tidyverse workflow?

What's the best way to do FA or PCA in the Tidyverse? Right now, I switch to base R using princomp() or the pysch package for my series reduction work.

Are there any solutions that fit into the tidyverse workflow?

You can do it similar to other types of modelling methods using list-columns and `purrr`

, `broom`

, and `dplyr`

functions.

```
library(tidyverse)
library(broom)
library(ggfortify) # for plotting pca
iris_pca <- iris %>%
nest() %>%
mutate(pca = map(data, ~prcomp(.x %>% select(-Species), center = TRUE, scale = TRUE)),
pca_tidy = map2(pca, data, ~broom::augment(.x, data = .y)))
```

That will give you this:

```
> iris_pca
# A tibble: 1 x 3
data pca pca_tidy
<list> <list> <list>
1 <data.frame [150 x 5]> <S3: prcomp> <data.frame [150 x 10]>
```

From there you can calculate the variance explained by each dimension like this:

```
iris_pca %>%
unnest(pca_tidy) %>%
summarize_at(.vars = vars(contains("PC")), .funs = funs(var)) %>%
gather(key = pc, value = variance) %>%
mutate(var_exp = variance/sum(variance))
```

which gives you this:

```
# A tibble: 4 x 3
pc variance var_exp
<chr> <dbl> <dbl>
1 .fittedPC1 2.92 0.730
2 .fittedPC2 0.914 0.229
3 .fittedPC3 0.147 0.0367
4 .fittedPC4 0.0207 0.00518
```

You can also plot using this same setup:

```
iris_pca %>%
mutate(
pca_graph = map2(
.x = pca,
.y = data,
~ autoplot(.x, loadings = TRUE, loadings.label = TRUE,
data = .y, colour = "Species")
)
) %>%
pull(pca_graph)
```

which gives you this:

You can extend this as far as you would like, with multiple models by grouping prior to nesting. You can also extend the graph easily just like you would for any other ggplot. To see some of the options for the autoplot pca specific graph, you can look at `?ggfortify::autoplot.prcomp`

. It is worth noting that the `autoplot.prcomp`

method only takes the UK spelling of `colour =`

.

I am not that familiar with factor analysis but I would imagine you could use this same workflow with it. The big dependency is whether `broom`

has a `tidy`

/`augment`

/`glance`

method for that model type. But even if it doesn't, you can still access the model once it is in a list column, it just may look a little more hacky.

Out of curiosity, why not stick with base-R or the psych package? This setup seems better than the tidyverse because base-R and psych aren't going to mess with their stable foundation any time soon. Sticking with this route, you know the same code will work in 1 year, 2 years, or 10 years from now.

Disclaimer - the tidyverse is awesome. I update my code to use as much of the tidyverse packages as possible once I learn new tidy package functions. Yet I still use base-R and psych for PCA and EFA because both are super simple and give all the info I want/need.

I would say that one of the major benefits of using this workflow is the ability to extend it to run multiple models or sub models all at once. It also provides the models in a format that is easy to work with (especially if there are `broom`

methods for the model type).

In addition, the method I provided did not abandon the base-R function that is used to perform the PCA, rather it just implemented it in the framework of the tidyverse. This allows for easy manipulation of model results and it stores all of the results in a convenient place, i.e., in a single data frame, rather than in several different variables that you then have to keep track of.

Super helpful question and answer (as always, @tbradley is a !)

@timpe, if your question has been answered, would you mind marking the solution? That way, someone in the future can come along and easily see what worked for you.

If you’re the OP (as you were in this case), there should be a little box at the bottom of replies that you can click to select that response as your “solution.”

*Example from one of my questions, below:*

How would I go about getting the loadings for a specific number of components, using this method? My "un-tidyverse" method has historically been to use `psych::principal()`

.

@phil Sorry for the super late response. I meant to respond to this when you asked but ultimately forgot.

I am not familiar with the `psych::principal`

function and it does not look like there are broom methods for this model type. However, you can still compute the model and operate on it in the same manner shown above.

Here is a basic example with the `USArrests`

dataset:

```
library(psych)
library(tidyverse)
us_arrests <- USArrests %>%
rownames_to_column(var = "state") %>%
# I prefer column names to be all lowercase so I am going to change them here
rename_all(tolower) %>%
as_tibble()
us_arrests_prin <- us_arrests %>%
nest() %>%
mutate(prin = map(data, ~psych::principal(.x %>% select(-state))))
us_arrests_prin$prin[[1]]
#> Principal Components Analysis
#> Call: psych::principal(r = .x %>% select(-state))
#> Standardized loadings (pattern matrix) based upon correlation matrix
#> PC1 h2 u2 com
#> murder 0.84 0.71 0.29 1
#> assault 0.92 0.84 0.16 1
#> urbanpop 0.44 0.19 0.81 1
#> rape 0.86 0.73 0.27 1
#>
#> PC1
#> SS loadings 2.48
#> Proportion Var 0.62
#>
#> Mean item complexity = 1
#> Test of the hypothesis that 1 component is sufficient.
#>
#> The root mean square of the residuals (RMSR) is 0.16
#> with the empirical chi square 15.25 with prob < 0.00049
#>
#> Fit based upon off diagonal values = 0.91
```

Created on 2018-06-20 by the reprex package (v0.2.0).

As a note, the graphics aren't as compatible when you use base graphics (as it seems the psych package uses) since the graphs are just simply plotted when run in a mutate call rather than saved as an object like ggplot objects. But this method would still help you keep your model objects tidy with the data.